To improve your experience on Lilly TrialGuide, please use the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Internet Explorer, with JavaScript enabled.
This website is not optimized for your browser, as configured.

Is Placebo Used in Cancer Clinical Trials?

Placebos In Cancer Clinical Research Feature Image

Editor's Note: The U.S. FDA recently published a guidance document on use of placebo in cancer clinical trials, which reminded us of a blog article from our archives investigating the same topic. We are republishing that blog article with its original findings from a search of in August 2013, to illustrate the point that, well before the guidance was published, placebo-controlled studies in cancer research were uncommon.

When it comes to cancer, fewer than 5 percent of patients diagnosed choose to participate in a clinical trial. So we took a look at the data available on to see if we could shed some light on the likelihood of receiving a placebo in a cancer clinical trial. At the time, the website listed a total of roughly 2,600 cancer trials in the U.S., with about 300 of them listing "placebo" as a method of intervention.

What We Found
The numbers show that less than 1 percent of all Phase 2 or Phase 3 cancer trials in the U.S. used a placebo alone versus the drug being studied. For the majority of trials that did use a placebo, they used it in conjunction with standard-of-care treatments, not in place of them. So, while there's a chance that a patient would receive a placebo in place of the drug being studied, in most of those cases, they would also receive a standard, clinically-tested, cancer-fighting medication in conjunction with it.

PlacebosInCancerClinicalResearch 4Sept2019-01

Notes on Our Methodology
We used to gather and parse all data for our infographic, as of August 2013. All the data reported in this blog post are from that date.

First, we did a search of all currently recruiting, interventional Phase 2 or 3 cancer trials in the U.S. When we pulled the numbers, there were 2,675 trials returned from the search criteria.

The next search we did used all the same criteria as our initial search, but we narrowed the results by specifying any trial with "placebo" used as an intervention method. There were 300 trials that fit the additional criteria.

Once we had all 300 trials that listed "placebo" as a method in some form or fashion, we searched through each trial manually to determine whether the trial was studying a drug to treat the cancer. If the research was focused on studying something other than treatment of the cancer—a side effect or symptom of cancer or prevention in pre-cancerous patients, for example—we put it into a Not Related category.

At the end of the manual sorting, we had 150 studies in the Not Related category. That left 150 trials that were related to studying the treatment of cancer.

The 150 studies that were focused on a treatment for cancer were then placed in one of two groups:

  1. Standard Of Care + Study Drug vs. Standard Of Care + Placebo: There were a total of 125 trials in this category. Each one focused on a treatment for cancer. One treatment arm consisted of a standard of care treatment plus the study drug. The other consisted of a standard of care treatment plus a placebo. For these trials, even if the patient received the placebo instead of the study drug, they were guaranteed to receive some kind of standard treatment as well.
  2. Study Drug vs. Placebo: There were 25 trials in this category, which is the one most people think of when they hear the word "placebo." These trials studied a drug to treat cancer. The treatment arms tested the study drug versus a placebo. In these trials, the patient would have an equal chance of receiving either the study drug or a placebo. They would not receive any other standard of care during the trial.

Take a look at Lilly's cancer clinical trials.

Blog post originally appeared on LillyPad.

Tags: Infographic, Oncology,

Recent Articles

STEM Clinical Trials

Celebrating STEM/STEAM in Clinical Trials

Ayana Rowley Henderson Headshot
Ayana Rowley Henderson
November 8th, 20192 minute read

Today is S.T.E.M. / S.T.E.A.M. Day, and we are excited to celebrate with you!

HistoryOfClinicalTrials Regulatory FeatureImage 22Jul2019-01

Clinical Trial History: Regulatory Guidelines and Requirements

Leigh Anne Naas Headshot
Leigh Anne Naas
October 31st, 20192 minute read

As the practice of medicine advances over time, successes and mistakes lead to regulatory guidelines and requirements.

BackToSchool ClinicalStudyReport FeatureImage 27Aug2019-01

Understanding Clinical Study Reports

Ayana Rowley Henderson Headshot
Ayana Rowley Henderson
October 24th, 20194 minute read

How does a clinical trial work? Learn how clinical study reports are used to report the results and outcomes of a clinical trial.

Magnifying glass looking over a piece of paper

Clinical Trial History: Being Transparent in Research

Leigh Anne Naas Headshot
Leigh Anne Naas
October 16th, 20192 minute read

In the long-evolving process of clinical research, the most recent focus is transparency. Explore more in this infographic.

Rik standing next to his mom Anu at conference

Following Your Dreams with IBD: Tips from the Experts

Susan Gilchrist headshot square
Susan Gilchrist
September 16th, 20194 minute read

Read tips from a patient and caregiver expert for how to achieve your dreams while managing a chronic disease like IBD.