To improve your experience on Lilly TrialGuide, please use the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Internet Explorer, with JavaScript enabled.
This website is not optimized for your browser, as configured.
Participation

Is Placebo Used in Cancer Clinical Trials?

Placebos In Cancer Clinical Research Feature Image

Editor's Note: The U.S. FDA recently published a guidance document on use of placebo in cancer clinical trials, which reminded us of a blog article from our archives investigating the same topic. We are republishing that blog article with its original findings from a search of ClinicalTrials.gov in August 2013, to illustrate the point that, well before the guidance was published, placebo-controlled studies in cancer research were uncommon.

Background
When it comes to cancer, fewer than 5 percent of patients diagnosed choose to participate in a clinical trial. So we took a look at the data available on ClinicalTrials.gov to see if we could shed some light on the likelihood of receiving a placebo in a cancer clinical trial. At the time, the website listed a total of roughly 2,600 cancer trials in the U.S., with about 300 of them listing "placebo" as a method of intervention.

What We Found
The numbers show that less than 1 percent of all Phase 2 or Phase 3 cancer trials in the U.S. used a placebo alone versus the drug being studied. For the majority of trials that did use a placebo, they used it in conjunction with standard-of-care treatments, not in place of them. So, while there's a chance that a patient would receive a placebo in place of the drug being studied, in most of those cases, they would also receive a standard, clinically-tested, cancer-fighting medication in conjunction with it.

PlacebosInCancerClinicalResearch 4Sept2019-01

Notes on Our Methodology
We used ClinicalTrials.gov to gather and parse all data for our infographic, as of August 2013. All the data reported in this blog post are from that date.

First, we did a search of all currently recruiting, interventional Phase 2 or 3 cancer trials in the U.S. When we pulled the numbers, there were 2,675 trials returned from the search criteria.

The next search we did used all the same criteria as our initial search, but we narrowed the results by specifying any trial with "placebo" used as an intervention method. There were 300 trials that fit the additional criteria.

Once we had all 300 trials that listed "placebo" as a method in some form or fashion, we searched through each trial manually to determine whether the trial was studying a drug to treat the cancer. If the research was focused on studying something other than treatment of the cancer—a side effect or symptom of cancer or prevention in pre-cancerous patients, for example—we put it into a Not Related category.

At the end of the manual sorting, we had 150 studies in the Not Related category. That left 150 trials that were related to studying the treatment of cancer.

The 150 studies that were focused on a treatment for cancer were then placed in one of two groups:

  1. Standard Of Care + Study Drug vs. Standard Of Care + Placebo: There were a total of 125 trials in this category. Each one focused on a treatment for cancer. One treatment arm consisted of a standard of care treatment plus the study drug. The other consisted of a standard of care treatment plus a placebo. For these trials, even if the patient received the placebo instead of the study drug, they were guaranteed to receive some kind of standard treatment as well.
  2. Study Drug vs. Placebo: There were 25 trials in this category, which is the one most people think of when they hear the word "placebo." These trials studied a drug to treat cancer. The treatment arms tested the study drug versus a placebo. In these trials, the patient would have an equal chance of receiving either the study drug or a placebo. They would not receive any other standard of care during the trial.

Take a look at Lilly's cancer clinical trials.

Blog post originally appeared on LillyPad.

Tags: Infographic, Oncology,

Recent Articles

RecommendationsforDecentralizedClinicalTrialCapabilitiesintheWakeofCOVID-19 FeatureImage 22July2021-01

Recommendations for Decentralized Clinical Trial Capabilities in the Wake of COVID-19

Kevin Hudziak Photo
Kevin Hudziak
September 15th, 20214 minute read

Tips to implement an effective and successful decentralized clinical trial for multiple touch points.

CommittedToCancerResearch FI 8Sept2021-01

Committed to Cancer Research

Leigh Anne Naas Headshot
Leigh Anne Naas
September 24th, 20211 minute read

Lilly has a strong legacy in cancer research. Our dedicated oncology team work together to create medicines that make life better for people around the world.

ProudPartners FeatureImage 17Sept2021-01

Proud Partners in Breast Cancer Research

Leigh Anne Naas Headshot
Leigh Anne Naas
September 22nd, 20213 minute read

Lilly is proud to foster true partnerships with external stakeholders. By working together to raise awareness of breast cancer research, we can make life better for people around the world.

TheCOVID-19PandemicChangedHowSitesConductClinicalTrialsForever FeatureImage 22July2021-01

The COVID-19 Pandemic Changed How Sites Conduct Clinical Trials Forever

Kevin Hudziak Photo
Kevin Hudziak
July 29th, 20213 minute read

To better understand how various countries adapted to execute clinical trials during a pandemic, we conducted a series of virtual feedback sessions with clinicians from all over the world.

ThePathFromHCPtoResearcher FeatureImage 24Feb2021-01

The Path from HCP to Researcher: A Word of Advice

LTGBlogAuthors LillyGuestAuthorIcon 20July2018
Lilly Guest Author
April 21st, 20215 minute read

If you’re a physician interested in getting involved in clinical research, you must understand that it can be a big career shift. Luckily, Kamnesh Pradhan has valuable advice to share.